Determination of Potential Zones of Azolla filiculoides in Anzali International Wetland using GIS Technique

Authors

Abstract

Background: In recent years, the issue of the entry of non-native species into aquatic ecosystems has been noticed in many parts of the world. This can be considered as one of the most important indicators in the assessment of environmental vulnerabilities. Unfortunately, in recent decades Anzali international wetland has faced an expansion of Azolla filiculoides; and identification of areas prone to the presence of such species is necessary.
 
Methods: The information obtained from GIS plays an important role in the planning and management of aquatic ecosystems. For this purpose in this cross-sectional study, after preparing the required information layers based on the factors influencing the Azolla filiculoides distribution, the final map of susceptible places was prepared based on the fuzzy logic.
 
Results: The results showed that 45.18% of the total area of ​​the wetland is considered to be very susceptible to the presence of invasive species. Also, the west of the wetland had a higher potential, which matched the information of the factors affecting the distribution of this species.
 
Conclusion: The information obtained indicated the appropriate separability of fuzzy logic and GIS in identifying the points that are prone to Azolla filiculoides. Also, considering the vastness of susceptible areas, it is necessary to have a strategy and program to preserve this wetland and control its pollution and destructive factors.

Keywords


1. Monaem M, Nasseri G, Bagherzadeh Karimi M. Principles of weltlands identification, modelling, and deliniation. Tehran: NabNegar; 2009. [In Persian] 2. Ministry of Jihad. Water Committee. Studies for reviving the Anzali wetland; 1988. Vol 1-2. p. 320. [In Persian] 3. Shackelford N, Hobbs RJ, Heller NE, Hallett LM, Seastedt TR. Finding a middle-ground: the native/non-native debate. Biological Conservation 2013;158:55-62. doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.020 4. National Invasive Species Council (US). National management plan: meeting the invasive species challenge. National Agricultural Library of the US Department of Agriculture; 2001. 5. Boets P, Lock K, Cammaerts R, Plu D, Goethals PL. Occurrence of the invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) in Belgium (Crustacea: Cambaridae). Belgian Journal of Zoology 2009;139(2):173-6. 6. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1993. 7. Zimmerman WJ. Biomass and pigment production in three isolates of Azolla II. Response to light and temperature stress. Annals of Botany 1985;56(5):701-9. doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087059 8. Kay S, Hoyle S. Feathered Water Fern, Azolla pinnata. NC State University Aquatic Weed Fact Sheet, AWFS 009-00 [cited 2020 Jun 5]. Available from: http://plants.ifas.ufl.edu/plant-directory/azolla-pinnata/ 9. Delnavaz Hashemloian B, Ataei Azimi A. Alien and exotic Azolla in northern Iran. African Journal of Biotechnology 2009; 8(2):187-90. 10. Bodle M. Feathered mosquito fern (Azolla pinnata R. Br.) comes to Florida. Aquatics 2008;30:4-8. 11. Hill MP. The impact and control of alien aquatic vegetation in South African aquatic ecosystems. African Journal of Aquatic Science 2003;28(1):19-24. doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2003.9626595 12. Olenin S, Minchin D, Daunys D. Assessment of biopollution in aquatic ecosystems. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2007;55(7-9):379-94. doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.01.010 13. Pirasteh M. The protection and restoration of Anzali wetland. Department of Environmental Protection. Gilan: Library Research Center for Environmental Gilan; 1995.p. 373. Persian 14. Fallah M. Impacts of Land Use Changes on Water Quality of Anzali International Wetland [dissertation]. Isfahan: Isfahan University of Technology; 2014. [In Persian] 15. Costa ML, Santos MC, Carrapiço F, Pereira AL. Azolla–Anabaena's behaviour in urban wastewater and artificial media–Influence of combined nitrogen. Water Res 2009;43(15):3743-50. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.038. 16. National Research Council (US). Predicting Invasions of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2002. 17. Janes RA. The biology and control of Azolla filiculoides Lam. and Lemna minuta Kunth [dissertation]. England: University of Liverpool; 1995. 18. Zebiri M, Majd A. Introduction to Remote Sensing Technology and Applications in Natural Resources. 4th ed. Tehran: University Press; 2003. [In Persian] 19. Alavi Panah SK. Remote Sensing Application in Earth Sciences (Soil Science). 2nd ed. Tehran: Tehran University Press; 2006. [In Persian] 20. Brondizio ES, Moran EF, Mausel P, Wu Y. Land use change in the Amazon estuary: Patterns of Caboclo settlement and landscape management. Human Ecology 1994;22(3):249-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02168853 21. Azari Dehkordi F. Determining the border of the preserved area in Anzali wetland. Tehran: Iranian Department of Environmental Protection; 2009. p. 105. [In Persian] 22. Wagner GM. Azolla: a review of its biology and utilization. The Botanical Review 1997;63(1):1-26. 23. Van der Heide T, Roijackers RM, Van Nes EH, Peeters ET. A simple equation for describing the temperature dependent growth of free-floating macrophytes. Aquatic Botany 2006;84(2):171-5. doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.09.004 24. Mitchell DS, Tur NM. The rate of growth of Salvinia molesta (S. auriculata Auct.) in laboratory and natural conditions. Journal of Applied Ecology 1975; 12(1): 213-25. 25. Watanabe I, Berja NS. The growth of four species of Azolla as affected by temperature. Aquatic Botany 1983;15(2):175-85. doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(83)90027-X 26. Sadeghi R, Zarkami R, Sabetraftar K, Van Damme P. Application of classification trees to model the distribution pattern of a new exotic species Azolla filiculoides (Lam.) at Selkeh Wildlife Refuge, Anzali wetland, Iran. Ecological Modelling 2012;243:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.06.011 27. Sabet Raftar K. Azolla analysis of the environmental impacts on aquatic ecosystems of the wetlands [dissertation]. Tehran: Tehran University; 1994. [In Persian] 28. Shelton JL. Murphy T. Aquatic Weed Management Control Methods. SRAC: Southern Regional Aquaculture Center; 1989. No 360. 29. Jalili A, Hamzeh B, Asri Y, Shirvani A, Khoshnevis M, Pakparvar M, et al. Investigation on ecological pattern governing Anzali lagoon vegetation and their roles in ecosystem management. Journal of Science (University of Tehran) 2009; 35(1): 51-7. [In Persian] 30. Hosseinjani A, Bourani MS, Ahmadnezhad M, Sohrabi Langroudi T, Mahisefat F, Saberi Kouchesfahani H. Identification, Biomass determination and seasonal changes trend of the dominant aquatic plants’ cover in Anzali wetland. Tehran: Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute; 2014. [In Persian] 31. Mirzajani AR, Kiabi B, Jamalzadeh F, Fallahi M, Kamali A, Abdollahpour H, et al. Limnological survay of Anzali wetland data during 1990-2003 by use of GIS system. Tehran: Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute; 2009. [In Persian] 32. Cui B, Yang Q, Yang Z, Zhang K. Evaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China. Ecological Engineering 2009;35(7):1090-103. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.022 33. Hinkle RL, Mitsch WJ. Salt marsh vegetation recovery at salt hay farm wetland restoration sites on Delaware Bay. Ecological Engineering 2005;25(3):240-51. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.04.011 34. Comín FA, Sorando R, Darwiche-Criado N, García M, Masip A. A protocol to prioritize wetland restoration and creation for water quality improvement in agricultural watersheds. Ecological Engineering 2014;66:10-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02168853 35. Doren RF, Volin JC, Richards JH. Invasive exotic plant indicators for ecosystem restoration: an example from the Everglades restoration program. Ecological Indicators 2009;9(6):S29-36. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.08.006 36. Piniewski M, Gottschalk L, Krasovskaia I, Chormański J. A GIS-based model for testing effects of restoration measures in wetlands: A case study in the Kampinos National Park, Poland. Ecological Engineering 2012;44:25-35. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.013 37. McConnachie AJ, Hill MP, Byrne MJ. Field assessment of a frond-feeding weevil, a successful biological control agent of red waterfern, Azolla filiculoides, in southern Africa. Biological Control 2004; 29(3): 326-31. doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2003.08.010 38. Boswell J, Olyphant G. Modeling the hydrologic response of groundwater dominated wetlands to transient boundary conditions: Implications for wetland restoration. Journal of Hydrology 2007; 332(3-4):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.004