The Effect of Feed Volumetric Flow Rate and NaCl Concentration on Microbial Fuel Cell Efficiency

Authors

Abstract

Background: Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is an electrochemical device which uses microorganisms to convert chemical energy of bio-fuel to electrical energy. One of the most important issues in the performance of microbial fuel cells is overcoming the internal resistance of the cell. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of inlet discharge and different concentrations of NaCl on microbial fuel cell performance.
 
Methods: In this experimental study, 1 and 2 mL/min discharges as well as concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 M of NaCl were selected. We also used three continuous reactors, each with three main parts of anodes, cathodes, and polymer membranes, to investigate the effect of the above factors. The anode and cathode were carbon rods and the polymer membrane was Nafion 117.
 
Results: Compared to other concentrations, in 1 mL/min volumetric flow of feed and 0.5 M of NaCl concentration, MFC showed the best performance. However, in 2 mL/min volumetric flow, the best operation of MFC was in 1 M concentration of NaCl. With the change in discharge, the retention time changed, and with the change in concentration, the internal resistance of the cell as well as the process efficiency changed due to the change in the electrolyte conductivity. Changing the conductivity of the electrolyte alone did not decrease the internal resistance of the cell. Changes in discharge also showed that increasing the retention time did not result in higher efficiency.
 
Conclusion: Both the electrolyte change and the retention time should be considered for optimal cell performance.

Keywords


1. Hashemi J, Samimi A. Steady state electric power generation in up-flow microbial fuel cell using the estimated time span method for bacteria growth domestic wastewater. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2012;45:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.011 2. Sobieszuk P, Zamojska-Jaroszewicz A, Makowski Ł. Influence of the operational parameters on bioelectricity generation in continuous microbial fuel cell, experimental and computational fluid dynamics modelling. Journal of Power Sources 2017;371:178-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.032 3. Ivars Barceló F, Zuliani A, Fallah M, Mashkour M, Rahimnejad M, Luque R. Novel applications of microbial fuel cells in sensors and biosensors. Applied Sciences 2018;8:1184. doi: 10.3390/app8071184 4. Logan BE. Microbial Fuel Cells. 1th ed. Canada: Wiley-Interscience; 2008. 5. Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schröder U, Keller J, Freguia S, et al. Microbial fuel cells:  methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol 2006;40(17):5181-92. doi: 10.1021/es0605016 6. Ieropoulos IA, Stinchcombe A, Gajda I, Forbes S, Merino-Jimenez I, Pasternak G, et al. Pee power urinal–microbial fuel cell technology field trials in the context of sanitation. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2016;2(2):336-43. doi:10.1039/C5EW00270B 7. Deng H, Wu YC, Zhang F, Huang ZC, Chen Z, Xu HJ, et al. Factors Affecting the Performance of Single-Chamber Soil Microbial Fuel Cells for Power Generation. Pedosphere 2014;24(3):330-8. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60019-9 8. Miroliaei MR, Samimi A, Mohebbi-Kalhori D, Khorram M. K Kinetics investigation of diversity cultures of E. coli and Shewanella sp., and their combined effect with mediator on MFC performance. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 2015;25:42-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.10.011 9. Miroliaei M, Samimi A, Mohebbi-kalhori D, Khorram M, Qasemi A. Competition between E. coli and Shewanella sp. for electricity generation in air cathode MFC in presence of methylene blue as artificial mediator. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 2015;34(4): 1097-105. doi:10.1002/ep.12111 10. Liu H, Cheng SA, Logan BE. Power generation in fed-batch microbial fuel cells as a function of ionic strength, temperature, and reactor configuration. Environ Sci Technol 2005;39(14):5488-93. doi: 10.1021/es050316c 11. Wang X, Cheng S, Zhang X, Li Xy, Logan BE. Impact of salinity on cathode catalyst performance in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2011;36(21):13900-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.052 12. Chaudhuri SK, Lovley DR. Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21(10):1229-32. doi: 10.1038/nbt867 13. Gil GC, Chang IS, Kim BH, Kim M, Jang JK, Park HS, et al. Operational parameters affecting the performannce of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Biosens Bioelectron 2003;18(4):327-34. doi: 10.1016/s0956-5663(02)00110-0 14. Afrasyabi A, Samimi AR, Mohebi Kalhori D, Abdi Alimestani J. The effect of the electrode and concentration of sodium chloride on the performance of microbial fuel cell. The First International Conference of Oil, Gas, Petrochemical and Power Plant; 2012 Jun 19; Tehran: 2012. [In Persian] 15. Sobhani M, Qashlaqi R, Akhavan Mahdavi M, The effect of feed flow rate on the performance of microbial fuel cell in a continuous process. 4th Iranian Bioenergy Conference; 2013 Oct 31; Tehran: Hamandishan Energy Kimia Corporation; [In Persian]