Investigating the Effectiveness of Virtual Physical Activity Education on Students’ Quality of Life of Karaj in 2020

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Virtual School of Medical Education and Management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

10.34172/jhad.92330

Abstract

Background: Sedentary lifestyle is regarded as one of the main risk factors for obesity and chronic diseases. As schools provide students with important opportunities for physical activity, their closure, prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic, had a detrimental impact on vulnerable populations, particularly youth and school students. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of virtual physical education on students’ quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: This community trial was conducted with an experimental and a control group. For this purpose, 300 students aged 13 to 15 years, selected among students of the 1st year of high school, were selected from the four education districts of the urban areas of Karaj city in the year 2020 using a cluster sampling method. The selected students were randomly assigned to the two groups of intervention and control, each with 150 people. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of inclusion criteria and demographic characteristics. Following group assignment, the intervention group received virtual physical education for eight 30-minute sessions, one session each week. All subjects completed the Physical Activity and Quality of Life Questionnaires before and after the training. The data were analyzed with SPSS software version 20, using the chi-square test, paired t-test, and independent t-test.
Results: The mean and standard deviation of the scores in almost all areas of quality of life (both physical activity and mental health) in the intervention group had a significant improvement after the training courses (P < 0.05). After training, the mean scores of quality of life in the virtual education group were significantly greater than control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The virtual school-based physical activity intervention had positive effects on children’s psychological and psychological wellbeing. The online educational method could provide customizable physical education learning activities as a suitable step in promoting physical activity engagement for different groups of students.

Keywords

References

  1. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(1):23-35. doi: 1016/s2352-4642(19)30323-2.
  2. Stockwell S, Trott M, Tully M, Shin J, Barnett Y, Butler L, et al. Changes in physical activity and sedentary behaviours from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: a systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021;7(1):e000960. doi: 1136/bmjsem-2020-000960.
  3. Kang SJ, Jung SI. Age-related morbidity and mortality among patients with COVID-19. Infect Chemother. 2020;52(2):154-64. doi: 3947/ic.2020.52.2.154.
  4. Polero P, Rebollo-Seco C, Adsuar JC, Pérez-Gómez J, Rojo-Ramos J, Manzano-Redondo F, et al. Physical activity recommendations during COVID-19: narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;18(1):65. doi: 3390/ijerph18010065.
  5. Bisgin H. The impact of virtual physical education on physical activity and the reduction of sedentary of elementary students in the COVID-19 Era. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(2):825-32. doi: 53350/pjmhs22162825.
  6. Parnian S. Review of the Document of Fundamental Transformation of Education. Tehran: Farzaneghan University; 2019.
  7. Kaos MD, Beauchamp MR, Bursick S, Latimer-Cheung AE, Hernandez H, Warburton DE, et al. Efficacy of online multi-player versus single-player exergames on adherence behaviors among children: a nonrandomized control trial. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(10):878-89. doi: 1093/abm/kax061.
  8. Chambers F, Sandford R. Learning to be human in a digital world: a model of values fluency education for physical education. Sport Educ Soc. 2019;24(9):925-38. doi: 1080/13573322.2018.1515071.
  9. Marttinen R, Daum D, Fredrick RN 3rd, Santiago J, Silverman S. Students’ perceptions of technology integration during the FIT unit. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019;90(2):206-16. doi: 1080/02701367.2019.1578328.
  10. Dehnavi A. In-person training of physical education course in the context of new media tools. Development of Physical Education. 2020;21(1):20-2.
  11. Daum DN. Thinking about hybrid or online learning in physical education? Start here! J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 2020;91(1):42-4. doi: 1080/07303084.2020.1683387.
  12. Draper CE, Milton K, Schipperijn J. COVID-19 and physical activity: how can we build back better? J Phys Act Health. 2021;18(2):149-50. doi: 1123/jpah.2021-0037.
  13. Lynch T, Soukup GJ. Primary physical education (PE): school leader perceptions about classroom teacher quality implementation. Cogent Educ. 2017;4(1):1348925. doi: 1080/2331186x.2017.1348925.
  14. Brown HE, Atkin AJ, Panter J, Wong G, Chinapaw MJ, van Sluijs EM. Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: a systematic review, meta-analysis and realist synthesis. Obes Rev. 2016;17(4):345-60. doi: 1111/obr.12362.
  15. Chzhen Y, Moor I, Pickett W, Toczydlowska E, Stevens G. International trends in ‘bottom-end’ inequality in adolescent physical activity and nutrition: HBSC study 2002-2014. Eur J Public Health. 2018;28(4):624-30. doi: 1093/eurpub/ckx237.
  16. Hassan SU, Algahtani FD, Zrieq R, Aldhmadi BK, Atta A, Obeidat RM, et al. Academic self-perception and course satisfaction among university students taking virtual classes during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Kingdom of Saudi-Arabia (KSA). Educ Sci. 2021;11(3):134. doi: 3390/educsci11030134.
  17. Nguyen T. The effectiveness of online learning: beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT J Online Learn Teach. 2015;11(2):309-19.
  18. Webster CA, D’Agostino E, Urtel M, McMullen J, Culp B, Loiacono CA, et al. Physical education in the COVID era: considerations for online program delivery using the comprehensive school physical activity program framework. J Teach Phys Educ. 2021;40(2):327-36. doi: 1123/jtpe.2020-0182.
  19. Gao Z, Lee JE, McDonough DJ, Albers C. Virtual reality exercise as a coping strategy for health and wellness promotion in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1986. doi: 3390/jcm9061986.
  20. Ahmadi A, Aghdasi M, Ahmadi M. Effects of web-based physical activity interventions on physical activity and well-being in adolescents with insufficient physical activity. Health Psychol. 2018;6(24):53-68. [Persian].
  21. López-Carril S, Escamilla-Fajardo P, Alguacil-Jiménez M. Physical activity using social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: the perceptions of sports science students. Phys Cult Sport Stud Res. 2021;92(1):19-31. doi: 2478/pcssr-2021-0022.
  22. Abou Elmagd M. Sports and physical activity during (COVID-19) pandemic. Int J Phys Educ Sports Health. 2020;7(3):82-4.
  23. https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/. Accessed December 3, 2020.
  24. Tran VD, Do VV, Pham NM, Nguyen CT, Xuong NT, Jancey J, et al. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire-short form for application in Asian countries: a study in Vietnam. Eval Health Prof. 2020;43(2):105-9. doi: 1177/0163278718819708.
  25. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ, Omidvari S. The Iranian version of 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12): factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:341. doi: 1186/1471-2458-9-341.
  26. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  27. Gheissari A, Farajzadegan Z, Heidary M, Salehi F, Masaeli A, Mazrooei A, et al. Validation of Persian version of PedsQL™ 4.0™ generic core scales in toddlers and children. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(5):341-50.
  28. de Oliveira Araújo F, de Lima LSA, Cidade PIM, Nobre CB, Neto MLR. Impact of Sars-Cov-2 and its reverberation in global higher education and mental health. Psychiatry Res. 2020;288:112977. doi: 1016/j.psychres.2020.112977.
  29. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001;39(8):800-12. doi: 1097/00005650-200108000-00006.
  30. Chyun DA, Melkus GD, Katten DM, Price WJ, Davey JA, Grey N, et al. The association of psychological factors, physical activity, neuropathy, and quality of life in type 2 diabetes. Biol Res Nurs. 2006;7(4):279-88. doi: 1177/1099800405285748.
  31. Smith DW, McFall SL. The relationship of diet and exercise for weight control and the quality of life gap associated with diabetes. J Psychosom Res. 2005;59(6):385-92. doi: 1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.062.
  32. Bize R, Johnson JA, Plotnikoff RC. Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2007;45(6):401-15. doi: 1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.017.
  33. Herman KM, Hopman WM, Vandenkerkhof EG, Rosenberg MW. Physical activity, body mass index, and health-related quality of life in Canadian adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(4):625-36. doi: 1249/MSS.0b013e31823a90ae.
  34. Kvalø SE, Natlandsmyr IK. The effect of physical-activity intervention on children’s health-related quality of life. Scand J Public Health. 2021;49(5):539-45. doi: 1177/1403494820971493.
  35. Watson A, Timperio A, Brown H, Hinkley T, Hesketh KD. Associations between organised sport participation and classroom behaviour outcomes among primary school-aged children. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0209354. doi: 1371/journal.pone.0209354.
  36. Gu X, Chang M, Solmon MA. Physical activity, physical fitness, and health-related quality of life in school-aged children. J Teach Phys Educ. 2016;35(2):117-26. doi: 1123/jtpe.2015-0110.
  37. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjöström M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(1):1-11. doi: 1038/sj.ijo.0803774.
  38. Ruiz JR, Castro-Piñero J, Artero EG, Ortega FB, Sjöström M, Suni J, et al. Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(12):909-23. doi: 1136/bjsm.2008.056499.
  39. Fogelholm M. Physical activity, fitness and fatness: relations to mortality, morbidity and disease risk factors. A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2010;11(3):202-21. doi: 1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00653.x.
  40. Onur O, Gumus I, Derbent A, Kaygusuz I, Simavli S, Urun E, et al. Impact of home-based exercise on quality of life of women with primary dysmenorrhoea: original article. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;18(1):15-8. doi: 10520/ejc65964.
  41. Hamidizadeh S, Ahmadi F, Aslani Y, Etemadifar SH, Salehi K, Kord Yazdi R. The effect of an exercise program on the health-quality of life in older adults. Iran J Aging. 2007;16(1):81-6. [Persian].
  42. Brach JS, Simonsick EM, Kritchevsky S, Yaffe K, Newman AB. The association between physical function and lifestyle activity and exercise in the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(4):502-9. doi: 1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52154.x.
  43. Mansori M, Pakar E, Karimizadeh Ardakani M, Mohammadkhani k. The effect of regular physical activity on aggression and quality of life of students during corona quarantine (COVID-19). Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2022;9(4):398-408. doi: 52547/ijhehp.9.4.398. [Persian].
  44. Copleston F. History of Philosophy Volume 1: Greece and Rome. 8th ed. Duke University Press, Philosophical Review; 2003. p. 325-31.
  45. Ghasemipour M, Ghasemi V, Zamani AR. Study of life quality in the patients with diabetes referred to Khorramabad Shohada hospital in 2008. Yafteh. 2009;11(3):125-33. [Persian].
  46. Zabihi Maddah Z, Aghajani Mersa H. Dimensions of quality of life of the elderly by reviewing previous research. Social Welfare Quarterly. 2020;19(75):123-81. [Persian].
  47. Raes A, Vanneste P, Pieters M, Windey I, Van Den Noortgate W, Depaepe F. Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: an investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Comput Educ. 2020;143:103682. doi: 1016/j.compedu.2019.103682.
  48. Read T. Towards a new model for inclusive education based on virtual social inclusion and mobile openness. World J Educ Technol Curr Issues. 2020;12(1):14-22. doi: 18844/wjet.v12i1.4507.
  49. Hénard F, Roseveare D. Fostering quality teaching in higher education: policies and practices. In: An IMHE Guide for Higher Education Institutions. Paris, France: OECD; 2012. p. 7-11.
  50. Suresh M, Vishnu Priya V, Gayathri R. Effect of e-learning on academic performance of undergraduate students. Drug Invent Today. 2018;10(9):1797-800.
  51. Pavlovic A, DeFina LF, Natale BL, Thiele SE, Walker TJ, Craig DW, et al. Keeping children healthy during and after COVID-19 pandemic: meeting youth physical activity needs. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):485. doi: 1186/s12889-021-10545-x.
  52. Mercier K, Centeio E, Garn A, Erwin H, Marttinen R, Foley J. Physical education teachers’ experiences with remote instruction during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Teach Phys Educ. 2021;40(2):337-42. doi: 1123/jtpe.2020-0272.
  53. Killian CM, Kinder CJ, Woods AM. Online and blended instruction in K-12 physical education: a scoping review. Kinesiol Rev. 2019;8(2):110-29. doi: 10.1123/kr.2019-0003.
Health and Development Journal
Volume 11, Issue 2
May 2022
Pages 84-91

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 July 2023
  • Revise Date: 18 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 27 September 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics