Comparison of Body Composition Changes in Nursing/Midwifery Students of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at the Beginning and End of the First Semester

Authors

Abstract

Background: Due to the nutritional status changes, students are considered as at-risk group. The aim of this study was to compare the body composition changes in nursing/midwifery students of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences (RUMS) using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) at the beginning and end of the first semester.


Methods: In this cross-sectional study, all 57 newly entered nursing/midwifery students who had been registered in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences in 2012, were selected using census method. Body composition using BIA, and students’ height and waist circumference using a tape meter were measured and compared at the beginning and end of the first semester. Data were analyzed using independent t-test, paired t-test, and non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-ranks test by SPSS 18.


Results: The students’ mean age was 19.12±0.83 years. The comparison of lean body mass, total body water, and height of students at the beginning and end of the first semester showed a significant increase (P=0.023, P=0.032, and P=0.013, respectively). Body fat percentage in non-native students compared to the native ones increased (P=0.012). The percentage of underweight and overweight students did not show a significant difference at the beginning and end of the first semester (P=0.655).

Conclusion: At the end of the first semester, the increase percentage of body fat in non-native students was alarming. It seems that authorities should review the meal plan of students who live in dormitories and use healthy food pyramids for these students.

Keywords


1. Kęska A, Tkaczyk J, Czajkowska A, Wiśniewski A, Norkowski H, Smolarczyk M, et al. Fat content in young adults determined by skinfolds and body composition analyzator. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2012;18(1):33-6. 2. Ayatollahi SM, Bagheri Z, Heydari ST. Agreement Analysis among Measures of Thinness and Obesity Assessment in Iranian School Children and Adolescents. Asian J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;4(4):272-80. 3. Diniz Araújo ML, Coelho Cabral P, Kruze Grande de Arruda I, Siqueira Tavares Falcão AP, Silva Diniz A. Body fat assessment by bioelectrical impedance and its correlation with anthropometric indicators. Nutr Hosp. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1999-2005. 4. Ranasinghe C, Gamage P, Katulanda P, Andraweera N, Thilakarathne S, Tharanga P. Relationship between Body Mass Index (BMI) and body fat percentage, estimated by bioelectrical impedance, in a group of Sri Lankan adults: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:797. 5. No authors listed. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement: National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Statement. Am J Clin Nutr 1996; 64(3 Suppl): 524S-32S. 6. Gropper SS, Newton A, Harrington P, Simmons KP, Connell LJ, Ulrich P. Body composition changes during the first two years of university. Prev Med. 2011 Jan;52(1):20-2. 7. Arroyo M, Rocandio AM, Ansotegui L, Herrera H, Salces I, Rebato E. Comparison of predicted body fat percentage from anthropometric methods and from impedance in university students. Br J Nutr. 2004 Nov;92(5):827-32. 8. Goonasegaran AR, Nabila FN, Shuhada NS. Comparison of the effectiveness of body mass index and body fat percentage in defining body composition. Singapore Med J. 2012 Jun;53(6):403-8. 9. Farajian P, Renti E, Manios Y. Obesity indices in relation to cardiovascular disease risk factors among young adult female students. Br J Nutr. 2008 Apr;99(4):918-24. 10. Pawloski LR, Davidson MR. Physical activity and body composition analysis of female baccalaureate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2003 Sep;3(3):155-62. 11. Salem Z, Sheikh Fathollahi M, Khatami F, Iranmanesh F, Rezaeian M. Survey of Anthropometric Indices and Body Composition Changes During Newcomer Medical Students. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2014; 13(5): 407-18. 12. Ross AC, Caballero B, Cousins RJ, Tuker KL, Ziegler TR. Modern nutrition in health and disease. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. 13. International Diabetes Federation. The IDF Consensus definition of the metabolic syndrome. [cited 2016 Dec 21] Available from: https://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/MetS_def_update2006.pdf 14. Mescher AL. Junqueira’s Basic Histology. Translated by Shirazi R. 13th ed. Tehran: Mirmah; 2013. 15. Koutoubi S, Huffman FG. Body composition assessment and coronary heart disease risk factors among college students of three ethnic groups. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Jun;97(6):784-91. 16. Shimbo S, Zhang ZW, Matsuda-Inoguchi N, Higashikawa K, Nakatsuka H, Watanabe T, et al. Effects of life away from home and physical exercise on nutrient intake and blood/serum parameters among girl students in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2004 Aug;203(4):275-86. 17. Newton AL. Freshman versus Sophomore Year Changes in Body Weight and Composition [dissertation]. Alabama: Auburn University; 2010. 18. Papadaki A, Hondros G, A Scott J, Kapsokefalou M. Eating habits of university students living at, or away from home in Greece. Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):169-76. 19. Olearo B, Soriano Del Castillo JM, Boselli PM, Micó Pascual L. Assessment of body composition, through anthropometric and non-anthropometric methods, of university students from Valencia (Spain). Nutr Hosp. 2014 Oct 1;30(4):911-8. 20. Amani R. Comparison between bioelectrical impedance analysis and body mass index methods in determination of obesity prevalence in Ahvazi women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Apr;61(4):478-82. 21. Heydari ST, Ayatollahi SM, Zare N. Diagnostic value of bioelectrical impedance analysis versus body mass index for detection of obesity among students. Asian J Sports Med. 2011 Jun; 2(2): 68–74. 21. Heydari ST, Ayatollahi SM, Zare N. Diagnostic value of bioelectrical impedance analysis versus body mass index for detection of obesity among students. Asian J Sports Med. 2011 Jun; 2(2): 68–74.