The Rate of Normal Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section in Two Six Month Periods before and After the Health Reform Project in Hospitals Affiliated to Kerman University of Medical Sciences

1. Asad zadeh F, Mashufy M, Homyounfar N, Imanparvar M, Azimi S, Soltani R. Sexual problems caused by vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Journal of Health & Care 2011; 13(3):41-6. Persian. 2. Boone KW, Whittenburg L, Saba VK. IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement; 2011. 3. Venes D. Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary. 2th ed. London: F. A. Davis Company; 2013. 4. Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, Norman JE, McLernon DJ. Planned Repeat Cesarean Section at Term and Adverse Childhood Health Outcomes: A Record-Linkage Study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(3):e1001973. 5. Mei-Dan E, Asztalos EV, Melamed N, Willan AR, Barrett JF. Induction of labor versus cesarean section in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 214(1):S164-5. 6. Kaur H, Kaur S, Sikka P. A quasi-experimental study to assess the effectiveness of early ambulation in post-operative recovery among post-caesarean mothers admitted in selected areas of Nehru Hospital, PGIMER, Chandigarh. Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal. 2015; 11(1):33-44. 7. Baghianimoghadam MH, Zolghadar R, Moghadam BB, Darayi M, Jozy F. Related factors to choose normal vaginal delivery by mothers based on Health Belief Model. J Educ Health Promot. 2012;1:17. 8. Amiri M, Raei M, Chaman R, Rezaee N. Investigating some of the factors influencing choice of delivery type in women working in Shahroud University of Medical Sciences. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013; 20(106):1-9. Persian 9. Rahmati Najarkolaei F, Eshraghi T, Dopeykar N, Zamani O. Determinants of delivery type selection by using theory of planned behaviors (TPB). J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2015; 12(12):1062-70. Persian 10. Abedyan Z, Navayi M, JafariSani H, Arani A, Ebrahimzadeh S. comparing the effect of two teaching methods, role playing and lecture on primigravida women’s knowledge, attitude and performance according to delivery mode. Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gyneocology and Infertility. 2012; 15(1):25-35. 11. Hantoushzadeh S, Rajabzadeh A, Saadati A, Mahdanian A, Ashrafinia N, Khazardoost S, et al. Caesarean or normal vaginal delivery: overview of physicians' self-preference and suggestion to patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(1):33-7. 12. Wankaew N, Jirapradittha J, Kiatchoosakun P. Neonatal morbidity and mortality for repeated cesarean section vs. normal vaginal delivery to uncomplicated term pregnancies at Srinagarind Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2013;96(6):654-60. 13. Torkan B, Parsay S, Lamyian M, Kazemnejad A, Montazeri A. Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:4. 14. Shakeri M, Mazloumzade S, Mohamaian F. Factors Affecting the Rate of Cesarean Section in Zanjan Maternity Hospitals in 2008. J Zanjan Univ Med Sci 2012; 20(80):98-104. Persian 15. Zibad HA, Moghadam KB, Moghadam MB, Binabaj NB, Rafat E. The correlation between type of delivery and umbilical cord blood hemoglobin and hematocrit in full- term neonates. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. 29(163):1298-1305. Persian. 16. Hajian S, Vakilian K, Shariati M, Esmaeel AM. Attitude of pregnant women, midwives, obstetricians and anesthesiologists towardmode of delivery: a qualitative study. Payesh. 2011; 10(1):39-48. Persian 17. Makkii M, Yazdi NA. Sexual dysfunction during primiparous and multiparous women following vaginal delivery. Tanzan J Health Res. 2012;14(4):263-8. 18. Hosseini L, Iran-Pour E, Safarinejad MR. Sexual function of primiparous women after elective cesarean section and normal vaginal delivery. Urol J. 2012;9(2):498-504. 19. Fabri RH, Murta EF. Socioeconomic factors and cesarean section rates. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;76(1):87-8. 20. Ostovar R, Rashidi BH, Haghallahi F, Fararoei M, Rasouli M, Naeimi E. Non-medical factors on choice of delivery (CS/NVD) in hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. [dissertation] Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 2013. Persian 21. Akbarzadeh F, Talaei A, Tavassoli F, Jalaliani S, Talebi M, et al. Psychological characteristics of women with vaginal delivery, elective and emergency cesarean section. Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2016; 58(10): 611-19. Persian 22. Hadizadeh F, Bahri N, Tavakolizadeh J. Comparison of depression after emergency cesarean section and vaginal delivery in nullipara pregnant women in 22 Bahman Gonabad hospitals (1382). Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. 2005; 8(4):21-30. Persian. 23. Alimohamadian M, Shariat M, Mahmodi M, Ranezanzade F. Pregnant women request effect on the rate of elective cesarean. Payesh. 2003; 2(2):133-9. Persian 24. Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Training. The Program for the Promotion of Natural Childbirth. [cited 2016 Mar 15] Available from: http://tahavol.behdasht.gov.ir/index.aspx?siteid=426&fkeyid=&siteid=426&pageid=52669 25. Behmanesh S, IranFar S, Kamravamanesh M, Rezayi M. Factors related to the selection of delivery methods in pregnant women (Kermanshah, 2010). Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. 2010; 13(1):101-2. Persian 26. Sakkaki M, Hajimiri K. Causes of Cesarean Section in an Educational Hospital at Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. Preventive Care in Nursing & Midwifery Journal. 2012; 1(2):21-8. 27. Goodarzi L, Khayyeri F, Meshkini A, Khaki A. Health System Transition plan with an emphasis on the Program for promoting Normal Delivery in Governmental hospitals covered by Medical Universities and Health Services. The National Congress of Criticizing the Performance of the Eleventh Government, in the Field of Health; 2015 May 5-6; Tehran: Universities of Medical Sciences across the country, Policies Council of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education, National Institute for Health Research of the Islamic Republic of Iran; 2015. p. 11. 28. Firoozi M, Hadizadeh Talasaz F. The Survey of attitude of gynecologists and midwives about vaginal birth after caesarean delivery and barriers from their views. Ofogh-e-Danesh. 2006; 12(2):26-33. Persian 29. Parajian T, Angle P, Kurtz Landy CM, Djordjevic J. A snapshot of women’s attitudes and preferences toward labor epidural analgesia and cesarean delivery. Int J Anesth Res. 2016; 4(1):195-202. 30. Boskabadi H, Zakerihamidi M, Bagheri F. Outcomes of vaginal delivery and cesarean in Mashhad Ghaem University Hospital. Tehran Univ Med J. 2014; 71 (12):807-15. Persian