Analysis of the Policy of Integrating Medical Education into the Service Delivery System from the Perspective of External Stakeholders

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

10.34172/JHAD.92400

Abstract

Background: Following the shortage of medical staff and lack of facilities, the integration policy was implemented in 1984 in Iran, and the Ministry of Health, Treatment, and Medical Education was formed. This policy, like any other policy, has many strengths and weaknesses in the medical and non-medical fields. However, despite the significance, scope, and depth of this policy, a limited number of studies have addressed the policy, and most of the studies in this field have investigated and reported the consequences of the implementation of the integration policy and the extent to which its goals have been realized in Iran. Thus, to fill this research gap, the present study aimed to analyze the perspective of external stakeholders, mainly officials and non-medical faculty members, about the policy of integrating medical education into the service delivery system.
Methods: In this qualitative study, 9 experts from non-medical universities were interviewed. Overall, after interviewing 6 faculty members, the collected data reached the saturation point and no new information was obtained. However, three more interviews were conducted to ensure the credibility of the data. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews via two group video conference sessions and several individual sessions using telephone calls. Each group interview lasted 120 to 150 minutes and each interview lasted 20 to 30 minutes. The interviews were recorded and transcribed word by word for analysis.
Results: The analysis of the collected data revealed four subcategories including (1) fragmentation of higher education, (2) wastage of resources, (3) ineffective execution of national higher education policies in the healthcare sector, and (4) disruption of the convergence of sciences. Each subcategory consisted of several primary codes.
Conclusion: The findings highlighted the need to analyze external stakeholders’ attitudes toward the policy of integrating medical education and explore its advantages and disadvantages at a macro level. The data also revealed significant damages made to science and technology and the need for a well-defined roadmap to preserve policy achievements and minimize the significant damages incurred due to the disintegration of medical education from other disciplines.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Scientific Association of Medical Education. Analysis of scientific documentation and administrative integration of medical education and care system. 1st ed. Tehran: 3rd-Millennium Culture. 2003.
  2. Shackebaei D, Karami Matin B, Amolaee K, Rezaie M, Abdolmaleki P, Reshadat S, et al. Achieving the goals of integration of medical education and health service delivery systems from the viewpoint of the faculty members of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Sci j Kurdistan Univ Med Sci. 2011;16(1):81-91. [Persian].
  3. Rifkin S. Review of the Process of Findings of Healthcare Utilization Study for Developing a Model for Community Participation in the Iranian Context. WHO Consultant;. 2005.
  4. Nedjat S, Yazdizadeh B, Gholami J, Ashorkhani M, Nedjat S, Maleki K, et al. Effect of Ministry of Health and Medical Education structure on application of medical research. Hakim Res J. 2008;11(3):1-10. [Persian ].
  5. Colin T. Intersectoral Collaboration in the IR Iran. WHO Consultant; 2005.
  6. Collins C. Rapid Organizational Review of the Iranian Health System. WHO Consultant; 2005.
  7. World Health Organization. Framework on integrated, people-centred health services. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2016;2019.
  8. Nadim A, Shadpour K, Holakouei K, Naghavi M, Nikpour B, Alai M. Opinion survey on joining of health care organizations with university of medical sciences. Hakim Res J. 1999;2(2):67-74. [Persian].
  9. WHO EMRO. Assignment Report on Integration of medical education and delivery of health services in the Islamic Republic of Iran. WHO EMRO; 2006.
  10. Noori Hekmat S, Haghdoost AA, Dehnavieh R, Ghorbani Nia R. The consequences of integration of the medical education and the health services system of Iran: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of literature. Iran J Epidemiol. 2019;14(0):12-26. [Persian].
  11. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-12. doi: 1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
  12. Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educ Technol Res Dev. 1981;29(2):75-91. doi: 1007/bf02766777.
  13. Biglar M, Bastani P, Vatankhah S. The challenges of stewardship in medical education system: a qualitative approach. Payavard Salamat. 2013;7(4):299-311. [Persian].
  14. Smith RD. Strategic Planning for Public Relations. Routledge; 2020.
  15. Noori Hekmat S, Tourani S, Haghdoost A, Ebrahimipour H, Mehrolhassani M, Dehnavieh R. Beneficial and adverse effects of the integration of medical education and health service in IR. Iran; a Delphi exercise. J Med Sci (Faisalabad). 2014;14(1):21-8. doi: 3923/jms.2014.21.28.
  16. Majdzadeh R, Nedjat S, Denis JL, Yazdizadeh B, Gholami J. ‘Linking research to action’ in Iran: two decades after integration of the health ministry and the medical universities. Public Health. 2010;124(7):404-11. doi: 1016/j.puhe.2010.03.026.
  17. Pezeshkian M, Karimi A, Akbari ME, Einollahi B, Hosseini J, Hosseini F. Integration of medical education and health care: the experience of Iran. J Med Educ. 2003;3(1):e105019. doi: 22037/jme.v3i1.874.
  18. Amiresmaili MR, Negahdari S, Khosravirad Z, Tohidi M, Khosravi S. Management of teaching hospitals; opportunities and threats. Stride Dev Med Educ. 2016;13(4):337-48.
  19. Majdzadeh R, Nedjat S, Gholami J, Nedjat S, Maleki K, Qorbani M, et al. Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: two decades after integration. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7:8. doi: 1186/1478-4505-7-8.
  20. Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care. 1998;7(3):149-58. doi: 1136/qshc.7.3.149.
  21. Tourani S, Haghdoost AA, Maleki MR, Ravaghi H, Dehnavieh R, Noori Hekmat S. The backgrounds, consequences, and future of the integration of Medical Education and Health Service Delivery System. HealthMed. 2011;5(6):1847-56.
  22. Sukhanova E. S24-03 The role of arts and humanities in undergraduate medical curricula. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24:S135. doi: 1016/s0924-9338(09)70368-2.
Health and Development Journal
Volume 13, Issue 3
September 2024
Pages 125-130

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 August 2024
  • Revise Date: 21 September 2024
  • Accept Date: 13 October 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics